01
Agentic development
Coding agents handle implementation, refactoring, tests and repetitive engineering work while senior humans steer architecture and product decisions.
Service / Web & applications
Software that moves
at the speed of the idea.
Websites, product interfaces, internal tools and prototypes built through an AI-native workflow: strategy, design, code and iteration happening in the same room.
What changes
FIG. 01The bottleneck is no longer production. It is clarity.
Traditional web projects move through briefs, wireframes, design handoff, development handoff, QA and revision cycles. Every step creates waiting time and translation loss.
With coding agents like Claude Code and Codex working alongside senior engineers, a feature can be specified, implemented, reviewed and improved in hours — not weeks. The queue disappears. What remains is the only hard part: deciding what to build.
You see working software from week one. Not mockups of software. Software.
How we work
FIG. 02AI does not replace judgement. It removes drag around judgement.
02
Design in motion
Interface directions, states and variants are generated and compared in hours, then converged on what fits the brand and the user.
03
Continuous shipping
Small releases replace big reveals. The product becomes a living system: inspect, adjust, deploy, learn, repeat.
What you get
FIG. 03From concept to working product without the old queue.
- Claude Code
- Codex
- Astro
- React
- TypeScript
- GitHub Actions
- Marketing sites and landing pages
- Web applications and product interfaces
- Interactive prototypes that become the real product
- Internal tools and dashboards
- Design systems that actually ship
- API integrations and headless architectures
- Performance, SEO and accessibility baked in
Old model vs. Ex Machina
FIG. 04| Traditional agency | Ex Machina | |
|---|---|---|
| First working version | 6–10 weeks | Days |
| Feature cycle | 2–4 week sprints | Hours to days |
| Team you pay for | PM + designers + devs + QA + account | 1–2 seniors + agents |
| Handoffs | Brief → wireframe → design → dev → QA | One continuous loop |
Questions we actually get
Is AI-generated code reliable enough for production?
Agents write the code; senior engineers review, test and own every line that ships. The difference is velocity, not standards. Everything goes through the same review, testing and deployment discipline you would expect from a strong engineering team.
Who maintains the product after launch?
Either your team — we hand over clean, documented, boring-in-the-good-way code — or ours, through a retainer. Nothing we build requires us to stay.
What stack do you use?
The simplest one that solves your problem. We default to proven, mainstream technology — static-first sites, standard frameworks, managed infrastructure — because exotic stacks are a tax on your future.
Next step
Ready to talk about web & applications?
We'll tell you if we should work together.
A short conversation. No theatre. No deck. No delay.